Daniel Conderman 
It’s no secret that many people feel disappointed, even betrayed, by how the idea to “Defund the Police” played out. At its core, the call to defund was meant to reimagine public safety by investing in alternative services—like mental health counseling, community mediation, housing support, and other resources—to address problems at their roots. Yet, for a lot of folks, it seems like nothing much changed. If you share that frustration, you’re not alone.
Where Did “Defund the Police” Come From?
- A Response to Over-Policing: Many communities, especially those historically targeted by tough policing tactics, argued that officers with guns shouldn’t be the only responders for mental health crises, homelessness, or petty disputes.
- Reallocation of Funds: Rather than just cutting budgets, advocates hoped to shift a portion of police funding into non-police programs and crisis-response teams.
Why People Are Upset
- Lack of Clear Implementation: Despite political chatter, many proposed budget cuts were scaled back or reversed. Promises to launch new mental health units or unarmed community patrols fizzled out or never got funding.
- Absence of Real Alternatives: In many regions, the only response callers still get for any emergency is an armed police officer. Few new resources—like trauma-informed counselors, de-escalation experts, or social workers—were deployed in large numbers.
- Media & Political Spin: The conversation often got bogged down in extremes. Some leaders exploited the fear that “Defund the Police” meant abolishing law enforcement overnight, while others never moved beyond catchy slogans to flesh out practical policies.
Validating Your Concerns
It’s understandable to feel like this whole movement was a failed experiment, but it’s important to remember that the core goals—improved community safety, prevention of unnecessary force, and better outcomes for people in crisis—remain deeply relevant. The disappointment many feel is tied to the sense that political leaders and media organizations dropped the ball, leaving people wondering if real change is even possible.
- You’re not “crazy” or “negative” for feeling let down. Policy changes often require consistent pressure and clear implementation plans; if those aren’t there, the idea withers on the vine.
- Many share your fears about over-armed, undertrained officers responding to nonviolent calls. It’s natural to be concerned about the risk of escalation.
Finding Hope & Staying Informed
- Look at Local Models: Some communities have adopted or expanded co-response teams (social workers working alongside police) or mental-health-first responders with promising results. Though small in scale, these pilots show a glimmer of what might be possible.
- Keep the Pressure On: Local elections for mayors, city councils, and sheriffs can dramatically influence budget priorities. Community members who consistently show up to city hearings, budget meetings, and town halls can hold leaders accountable.
- Stay Connected: Grassroots groups and community organizations often provide updates on funding proposals, new pilot programs, and ways to get involved. Following them on social media or subscribing to newsletters can help you see what’s happening behind headlines.
Final Thoughts
Feeling frustrated, angry, or even cynical about the “Defund the Police” movement is understandable. The hope for safer, more equitable communities won’t be fulfilled by catchy slogans alone—it requires commitment, funding, and structural changes in how cities handle public safety.
Know that your concerns are valid, and you’re not alone in believing more can (and should) be done to create a system that better serves everyone. By staying informed, sharing stories, and supporting local reforms, we can keep pushing for the kinds of changes that the original calls to “defund” were really all about.
